Navigating Corporate DEI Programs in Light of Recent Supreme Court Ruling

In the wake of the recent US Supreme Court ruling on college admissions and its potential implications for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in corporate settings, businesses must now carefully assess and adapt their DEI programs to ensure compliance with federal and state regulations. While the ruling doesn't directly impact existing corporate DEI laws, it may prompt legal challenges and increased scrutiny of such programs.

The Federal Contractor Affirmative Action Model, governed by EO 11246 since 1965, serves as a guiding framework for companies seeking to develop effective DEI programs. The model emphasizes the importance of affirmative outreach and recruiting to attract diverse talent while ensuring race- and gender-neutral hiring and promotion practices. Adhering to the primary standards set by EO 11246 enables federal contractors to level the playing field for historically underrepresented groups without resorting to race- or gender-based preferences.

Become a Subscriber

Please purchase a subscription to continue reading this article.

Subscribe Now

DEI initiatives encompass a range of activities, including diversity training, fair compensation, and racial equality audits. In recent years, investors and regulatory bodies have placed increasing focus on corporate DEI efforts, encouraging board diversity and labor diversity reporting. However, the Supreme Court's ruling might impact employers in several ways:

Increased Litigation: The ruling may lead to Title VII litigation against businesses with race-conscious practices. Critics of DEI programs could exploit the Court's opinions to challenge such initiatives in the workplace.

Emphasis on Corporate DEI: Anti-DEI shareholder initiatives may rise, potentially leading to backlash in the workplace. Some state legislatures might cut workplace DEI programs in response to the judgment.

Reduced Corporate Diversity: The potential decline in diverse applicants to prestigious institutions without race-conscious admissions systems may affect corporate recruitment. Companies might find it challenging to hire and promote workers from historically underrepresented groups, hindering their overall diversity efforts.

To navigate these challenges and uncertainties, companies should proactively review and update their DEI programs and related policies to comply with federal and state workplace anti-discrimination laws. Corporate diversity recruitment can still target underrepresented groups, but quotas or preferences based on race or gender are prohibited. DEI initiatives should strive to include diverse experiences, such as military service, sexual orientation, handicaps, and citizenship in multiple countries, to withstand legal scrutiny.

Strong workplace DEI pledges can be developed to attract, retain, and promote historically underrepresented groups, counteracting the potential reduction in employment applications. Employers should collaborate with legal counsel to ensure that new initiatives and policies are in compliance with relevant laws.

By doing so, businesses can continue their DEI efforts, ensuring fair opportunities for all employees and maintaining a diverse and inclusive workforce.