FTC Appeals Microsoft/Activision Blizzard Merger Over Concerns of Monopoly Control

In a landmark ruling earlier this week, US District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley allowed Microsoft's colossal $69 billion merger with gaming giant Activision Blizzard to proceed, causing a stir in the gaming industry. However, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) was not content with the verdict and swiftly filed an appeal on Thursday, citing concerns over potential monopolistic control and its impact on video game titles like the immensely popular "Call of Duty."

The FTC's lawsuit complaint revolves around its failed attempt to halt the merger, which it believes could grant Microsoft exclusive dominion over key video game franchises. The regulatory body contends that if Microsoft were to gain such control, it would significantly hinder competition and harm consumer choice in the gaming market.

Become a Subscriber

Please purchase a subscription to continue reading this article.

Subscribe Now

Despite the FTC's vigorous appeal, Judge Corley dismissed the request for a preliminary injunction, stating that the government agency had not presented compelling evidence to support its claims. She highlighted that the FTC had failed to demonstrate the likelihood of Microsoft pulling "Call of Duty" from Sony PlayStation, nor had it sufficiently proven that the merger's completion would substantially reduce competition in the video game library subscription and cloud gaming sectors.

With the preliminary injunction denied, Microsoft could move forward with the acquisition of Activision Blizzard within days of the ruling. However, the corporations may decide to extend the duration before finalizing the deal, considering the potential ramifications of their combined operations.

The merger would place Microsoft as the third-largest video game publisher globally, trailing only behind Tencent and Sony. This new position of influence has raised concerns among industry observers, as the consolidation of power in the hands of one corporation could reshape the competitive landscape and raise questions about fair market practices.
The gaming community also expressed mixed sentiments about the impending merger.

While some welcomed the possibilities of enhanced resources and innovations that Microsoft's deep pockets could bring to Activision Blizzard's portfolio, others feared the potential consequences of a single entity monopolizing significant franchises. Concerns were particularly raised regarding the future availability of popular titles like "Call of Duty" on rival gaming platforms, leading to worries of restricted access for millions of gamers.

The FTC's appeal comes at a critical juncture, seeking to pause the merger temporarily until an administrative court can evaluate the full merits of the case. The regulatory body hopes that during this period it can gather further evidence to reinforce its arguments and demonstrate that Microsoft's acquisition of Activision Blizzard may have severe anti-competitive implications for the industry.

As the gaming world awaits the outcome of the FTC's appeal, industry experts are closely monitoring the developments and potential repercussions of this significant merger. The verdict will not only determine the future of two gaming giants but also shape the landscape of the video game market for years to come. It remains to be seen how the courts will weigh the interests of consumers, competitors, and the gaming industry at large when reaching their final decision on this high-stakes case.