Chess Player Hans Niemann’s $100 Million Cheating Case Dismissed

In a recent development that has sent shockwaves through the chess community, the $100 million cheating case filed by top chess player Hans Niemann has been dismissed by a federal court in Missouri. Niemann, a promising grandmaster, had claimed that he was wrongly accused of cheating after a contentious tournament match with another top player last year. However, the court ruled that the case fell outside its jurisdiction, leading to the dismissal of Niemann's defamation complaint.

The cheating scandal involving Niemann has been a subject of intense scrutiny within the chess world. Last September, he managed to end the remarkable 53-game winning streak of Magnus Carlsen, a five-time world champion and widely regarded as one of the greatest chess players in history. Carlsen raised suspicions about Niemann's swift rise to fame and accused him of cheating during their in-person match.

Become a Subscriber

Please purchase a subscription to continue reading this article.

Subscribe Now, a popular online chess platform, also alleged that Niemann had cheated in over 100 online games. However, no concrete evidence of board-cheating has ever been presented against him. In response to the accusations, Niemann filed a court complaint in October, accusing Carlsen of defaming him through Play Magnus and, with the latter acquiring Play Magnus in December.

Niemann's legal action took a broader turn as he also sued Grandmaster Hikaru Nakamura and others for monopolizing chess competitions and violating antitrust laws. However, the federal court judge dismissed these antitrust accusations, stating that the connection between the alleged fair competition breaches and Niemann's claimed injury was weak and insufficient to support an antitrust claim.

Judge Audrey Fleissig further stated that she lacked the authority to rule on Niemann's breach of contract and defamation claims, dealing a significant blow to his legal strategy. Undeterred, Niemann's lawyers have indicated their intention to pursue defamation charges in another state court.

While Niemann's case has been dismissed for now, the controversy surrounding cheating in chess continues to be a hot topic. The prevalence of online chess has raised concerns about the potential for cheating, and platforms like have implemented strict measures to detect and prevent unfair play. However, the Niemann case highlights the challenges of proving cheating allegations conclusively.

As the chess world grapples with the fallout from this high-profile case, it is clear that the issue of cheating in the game will remain a contentious and sensitive subject. The dismissal of Niemann's lawsuit has provided some relief for Carlsen and, who view it as a favorable outcome. However, the lingering questions about the integrity of chess competitions and the potential consequences of cheating are unlikely to fade away anytime soon.