Canadian Armed Forces Members Sue Over COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate

In a recent federal court case, more than 300 members of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) filed a lawsuit against top military officials, including Defence Minister Anita Anand, Chief of Defence Staff Gen. Wayne Eyre, and others, over the COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
The plaintiffs are seeking $1 million in damages each, along with recognition that their rights as military personnel were infringed upon. The lawsuit alleges that the vaccine mandate constitutes a violation of their rights and highlights concerns about abuse of power within the military chain of command.

According to Catherine Christensen, a representative from the Valour Legal Action Centre, the focus of the lawsuit is not solely on COVID-19 but rather on what she describes as "malicious and unlawful" actions by Canada's top military leadership.

Become a Subscriber

Please purchase a subscription to continue reading this article.

Subscribe Now

Christensen emphasizes that the snippets of stories provided by the plaintiffs in the lawsuit are distressing, and the extensive evidence presented, amounting to approximately 150,000 pages, reveals even more troubling aspects of the alleged abuse of power within the military hierarchy.

The defendants named in the lawsuit include Minister of Defense Anita Anand, Chief of Defense Staff Gen. Wayne Eyre, Vice Defense Staff Chief Lt.-Gen. Frances Allen, Surgeon General Maj.-Gen. J.G.M. Bilodeau, Judge Advocate General Rear Adm. Geneviève Bernatchez, and others. The Department of National Defense (DND) spokespersons have declined to comment on the ongoing legal proceedings.

The CAF's COVID-19 vaccination policy stipulates that completion of the primary vaccine series is mandatory only for CAF members directly involved in supporting operational readiness.

This includes personnel serving in high-readiness task forces, ready-duty ships, disaster assistance teams, non-combatant evacuation roles, and those collaborating with organizations such as the United Nations and NATO. For other members, the COVID-19 vaccine is strongly encouraged but not obligatory.

As the case unfolds, the outcome will shed light on the complex balance between public health measures and individual rights, as well as the allegations of abuse of power within the military chain of command. It remains to be seen how the courts will address these claims and their potential implications for vaccine mandates in the armed forces.