California’s VC Funding Transparency Law Advances Equity

In a landmark move, California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed a bill into law, ushering in a new era of transparency for the venture capital (VC) industry. Starting in 2025, covered VC firms across the United States will be required to annually report on the diversity demographics of the founders they support. This groundbreaking legislation aims to address the long-standing issue of underrepresentation among founders, particularly focusing on gender identity, race, ethnicity, disability status, and veteran status.

The scope of this bill encompasses the vast majority of U.S. venture firms, irrespective of their headquarters' location. This approach is open to all firms because the venture capital industry is very connected. Firms that are covered include those whose portfolio companies are based in or do a lot of business in California, as well as those that ask for or receive fund commitments from California residents.

Become a Subscriber

Please purchase a subscription to continue reading this article.

Subscribe Now

Founders will have the option to participate in the survey, and opting out will carry no consequences. The gathered data will be submitted to a state agency, which will then make it available through a searchable online database. Non-compliant firms may face fines, underscoring the seriousness with which this initiative is being pursued.

While the bill does not impose quotas or mandates on investment decisions, it leverages a naming-and-shaming strategy to encourage accountability. State Senator Nancy Skinner, the bill's lead sponsor, emphasizes the potential impact of transparency: "Sunshine sometimes works to change behavior." Many female founders have voiced their frustrations about the difficulty of even securing a meeting with VC funds, let alone securing an investment. This initiative aims to unlock significant economic and innovation opportunities that have long been overlooked.

However, it's important to note that some VC firms might find ways to manipulate the statistics. The reporting will be done based on the percentages of founders rather than the percentages of dollars, potentially allowing firms to appear more diverse than they are in practice. This underscores the need for ongoing scrutiny and evaluation of the reporting system.

As the industry grapples with the added administrative costs and founders contend with potentially intrusive questions, Allison Kelly from the ICA Fund reminds us that the first step towards addressing inequities is to measure them. Data is crucial in understanding where disparities exist and subsequently devising effective strategies to rectify them.

California's move towards transparency in VC funding sets a powerful precedent for the industry. By quantifying the support given to founders from underrepresented backgrounds, this legislation lays the foundation for a more equitable and inclusive entrepreneurial ecosystem. As other states consider similar measures, the hope is that this initiative will catalyze a broader shift towards greater diversity and representation in the world of venture capital.